I was using Stumbleupon and it referred me to this page, containing an argument that relies on the premise “Nothing is heavier than lead”. Immediately my mind went to work. These are the refutations I’ve come up with so far (and yes, there is a logical one, but who cares about THAT?).
- Two pounds of feathers are heavier than one pound of lead.
- The following elements are denser than lead (at standard temperature and pressure): Technetium, Thorium, Thallium, Palladium, Ruthenium, Rhodium, Hafnium, Curium, Mercury, Americium, Berkelium, Californium, Protactinium, Tantalum, Uranium, Gold, Tungsten, Plutonium, Neptunium, Rhenium, Platinum, Iridium and Osmium.
- Anything can be made denser than solid lead by compressing it, although some would take incredible amounts of energy to do so.
- Conversely, you could always you could always vaporize lead, and then any solid or liquid (or gas at a lower pressure) would be denser.
- Certain materials only exist in super-dense forms, and would therefore be denser than lead (black holes, neutronium).
And of course, as something approaches the speed of light, its apparent mass increases from the perspective of an observer “at rest”. So, a material accelerated to a sufficient proportion of the speed of light would be more dense than a given amount of lead (from the perspective of the lead at least).
For example, 1 mole of hydrogen (~1 gram) at 299,788.9 km/s (99.997% of the speed of light) has the same apparent mass as 1 moleĀ (~207 grams) of lead at rest.
And just to prove that anything with mass can weigh more than any amount of lead, 1 electron travelling at ~299792.457999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999997 km/s weighs the same as 1 mole of lead. (The reason this number has so many 9’s is because the speed of light is approximately 299792.4578 km/s)
The factor of relativistic changes (mass increase, time dilation, Lorentz contraction) is given by:
This last one is a bit of a stretch because it’s only observed mass, but if my understanding of relativity is correct, then there’s really no such thing as “objective mass” anyway; everything is relative.



